Microaces Response

FWIW. I appreciated the honest criticism on David's part. He shed a different light on a product, I believe it was a fair assessment. I tend to be less trusting of reviews when they are always positive. I'm not discouraged from purchasing a Microaces kit, as I'm sure I will get one eventually. Cost being the most prohibitive aspect.

The "review" certainly could have been better structured and poised, but as it is, the knee jerk reaction to a product is the easiest to identify with as a consumer.

That is my $0.02 worth. I would love more reviews like this, head shavings and all ;)


Log In to reply

Well it had already prompted me into e-mailling Microaces and telling them I thought the product look's amazing...... my flying is rubbish but I will be giving these ago.
Log In to reply

Cool thanks guys, didn't mean to give FT the bad report but it does really look shakey. I was browsing coments on YouTube about the vid and came across many common answers that state this: You have to know how to fly a warbird really, really well and be an expert pilot on it. This also explains how David couldn't stand it! As far as we know he hasn't ever flown a large scale GP warbird. Thanks again FT! Keep it up!
Log In to reply

Keep up the good work guys. I personally like the new format and from what I saw agree with David's conclusions. They are great little planes, but they are just too expensive to justify their size and functionality. I found Micro aces response a bit... arrogant. He didn't even address the control surface binding on his stickers.
Log In to reply

in general, ive noticed an explosion in RC aircraft activity since flite test came online. your tv comercial was great. quad copters have exploded, and i notice that your views keep growing. hopefully you guys go viral. keep it up
Log In to reply

I watch the show because of the honest opinions. In the whole review, I never equated Dave's opinion with it being a bad plane. You seemed to be apologizing for that and I think it just wasn't there.
Sure was good to get John's side of it too though. Really learned a lot. The whole even has woken up my interest in these planes.

The only problem I see is that Josh Scott missed having an airplane named after him.

Again.



Log In to reply